On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 09:58:12PM -0700, thomas wrote:
> Assuming newer version zpools, this sounds like it could be even
> safer since there is (supposedly) less of a chance of catastrophic
> failure if your ramdisk setup fails. Use just one remote ramdisk or
> two with battery backup.. whatever meets your paranoia level.   

If the iscsi initiator worked for me at all, I would be trying this.
I liked the idea, but it's just not accessible now.

--
Dan.

Attachment: pgpfrImp3sC6A.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to