> No one has said if they're using dks, rdsk, or file-backed COMSTAR LUNs yet.
> I'm using file-backed COMSTAR LUNs, with ZIL currently disabled.
> I can get between 100-200MB/sec, depending on random/sequential and block 
> sizes.
> 
> Using dsk/rdsk, I was not able to see that level of performance at all.
> 
> -- 
> Brent Jones
> br...@servuhome.net

Hi, I find comstar performance very low if using zvols under dsk, somehow using 
them under rdsk and letting comstar to handle cache makes performance really 
good (disks/nics become limiting factor).

Yours
Markus Kovero
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to