Ian Collins <i...@ianshome.com> wrote:
> In addition to Richard's comments, I doubt many medium to large
> businesses would use ufsdump/restore as their backup solution.
ufsdump/restore is a reliable backup sulution as long as you install
a mirrored root fs (in case you are using UFS as root fs).
In fact many sites now use a basic backup bethod that is much less
reliable than ufsdump/restore. The fact that they use a high level front
end does not necessarily remove limitations from the software that is used
as backend. I would never trust a backup sulution that uses e.g. GNU tar
as backend.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
j...@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
