Julian Regel <jrmailgate-zfsdisc...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> > If you like to have a backup that allows to access files, you need a file 
> > based 
>
> > backup and I am sure that even a filesystem level scan for recently changed 
> > files will not be much faster than what you may achive with e.g. star.
> >
> > Note that ufsdump directly accesees the raw disk device and thus _is_ at 
> > filesystem leven but still is slower than star on UFS.
>
> While I am sure that star is technically a fine utility, the problem is that 
> it is effectively an unsupported product.

>From this viewpoint, you may call most of Solaris "unsupported".

> If our customers find a bug in their backup that is caused by a failure in a 
> Sun supplied utility, then they have a legal course of action. The customer's 
> system administrators are covered because they were using tools provided by 
> the vendor. The wrath of the customer would be upon Sun, not the supplier 
> (us) or the supplier's technical lead (me).

Do you really believe that Sun will help such a customer?
There are many bugs in Solaris (I remember e.g. some showstopper
bugs in the multimedia area) that are not fixed although they are known
since a very long time (more than a year).

There is a bug in ACL handling in Sun's tar (reported by me in 2004 or even 
before) that is not fixed. As a result in many cases ACLs are not restored.

Note that bugs in star are fixed much faster and looking back at the 28 years
of history with star, I know of not a single bug that took more than 3 months
to get a fix. Typically, bugs are fixed withing less than a week - many bugs
even within a few hours. This is a support quality that Sun does not offer.

So please explain us where you see a problem with star......

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       j...@cs.tu-berlin.de                (uni)  
       joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: 
http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to