On 22-Dec-09, at 12:42 PM, Roman Naumenko wrote:
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009, Ross Walker wrote:
Applying classic RAID terms to zfs is just plain
wrong and misleading since zfs does not directly implement these
classic RAID approaches
even though it re-uses some of the algorithms for data recovery.
Details do matter.
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us,
I wouldn't agree.
SUN introduced just another marketing names for the well known
things, even adding some new functionality.
raid6 is raid6, not matter how you name it: raidz2, raid-dp, raid-
ADG or somehow else.
Sounds nice, but it's is just buzzwords.
The implied equivalence is wrong and confusing. That's the kind of
mislabelling that Bob was complaining about.
--Toby
--
Roman
ro...@naumenko.ca
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
