On Thu, 5 Nov 2009, Miles Nordin wrote: > allowing the first local patch into your site? or you are running a > closed-source release where you have to roll over and beg for support?
We're running Solaris 10. It does seem like I spend an undue amount of time lately dealing with Sun support, I have another open issue (http://www.mail-archive.com/zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org/msg30169.html) that's lasted over two months, involved multiple high-level support managers, and probably already cost the company considerably more resources thrashing than just applying the patch I already provided to fix the bug would have. As far as this NFS issue, when we initially reported the problem (which occurred with NFSv4), they claimed NFSv3 had the exact same behavior and since v4 worked like v3 it wasn't a bug. We didn't actually verify that, but at a later point a Red Hat support engineer indicated it worked correctly for him on a Solaris 10 server under v3, and only v4 was broken. We set up a v3 test and verified that was the case, which we've now pointed out on the support ticket, and are hoping it will actually get fixed now. -- Paul B. Henson | (909) 979-6361 | http://www.csupomona.edu/~henson/ Operating Systems and Network Analyst | hen...@csupomona.edu California State Polytechnic University | Pomona CA 91768 _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
