On Wed, September 30, 2009 08:21, p...@paularcher.org wrote:
>> It appears that I have waded into a quagmire.  Every option I can find
>> (cpio, tar (Many versions!), cp, star, pax) has issues.  File size and
>> filename or path length, and ACLs are common shortfalls.  "Surely there
>> is
>> an easy answer" he says naively!
>>
>> I simply want to copy one zfs filesystem tree to another, replicating it
>> exactly.  Times, Permissions, hard links, symbolic links, sparse file
>> holes, ACLs, extended attributes, and anything I don't know about.
>>
>> Can you give me a commandline with parameters?  I will then study what
>> they mean.
>>
>
> Have you ruled out using 'zfs send' / 'zfs receive' for some reason? And
> have you looked at rsync? I generally find rsync to be the easiest and
> most reliable tool for replicating directory structures. You may want to
> look at the GNU version of rsync (available at www.sunfreeware.com and
> elsewhere).

I had to discard an rsync-based backup scheme when I went to CIFS; rsync
doesn't handle extended attributes and ACLs, which CIFS uses.

And I haven't been able to make incremental replication send/receive work.
 Supposed to be working on that, but now I'm having trouble getting a
VirtualBox install that works (my real NAS is physical, but I'm using
virtual systems to test things).
-- 
David Dyer-Bennet, d...@dd-b.net; http://dd-b.net/
Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/
Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/
Dragaera: http://dragaera.info

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to