> On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Brian wrote: > > > I must say this thread has also damaged the view I > have of ZFS. > > Ive been considering just getting a Raid 5 > controller and going the > > linux route I had planned on. > > Thankfully, the zfs users who have never lost a pool > do not spend much > time posting about their excitement at never losing a > pool. > Otherwise this list would be even more overwelming. > > I have not yet lost a pool, and this includes the one > built on USB > drives which might be ignoring cache sync requests. > > Bob > -- > Bob Friesenhahn > bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us, > http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ > GraphicsMagick Maintainer, > http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ > ____________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discu > ss
Yes you are right, I spoke irrationally. I still intend to try it out at least for a period of time to see what I think. ill put it through the standard tests and such. However I am having trouble getting my motherboard to recognize 4 of the hard drives I picked ( I made a post about it in the storage forum). Once thats finished ill get this testing underway -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
