I ran the RealLife iometer profile on NFS based storage (vs. SW iSCSI), and got 
nearly identical results to having the disks on iSCSI:

iSCSI
IOPS: 1003.8
MB/s: 7.8
Avg Latency (s): 27.9

NFS
IOPS: 1005.9
MB/s: 7.9
Avg Latency (s): 29.7

Interesting!

Here is how the pool was behaving during the testing. Again this is NFS backed 
storage:

data01       122G  20.3T    166     63  2.80M  4.49M
data01       122G  20.3T    145     59  2.28M  3.35M
data01       122G  20.3T    168     58  2.89M  4.38M
data01       122G  20.3T    169     59  2.79M  3.69M
data01       122G  20.3T     54    935   856K  18.1M
data01       122G  20.3T      9  7.96K   183K   134M
data01       122G  20.3T     49  3.82K   900K  61.8M
data01       122G  20.3T    160     61  2.73M  4.23M
data01       122G  20.3T    166     63  2.62M  4.01M
data01       122G  20.3T    162     64  2.55M  4.24M
data01       122G  20.3T    163     61  2.63M  4.14M
data01       122G  20.3T    145     54  2.37M  3.89M
data01       122G  20.3T    163     63  2.69M  4.35M
data01       122G  20.3T    171     64  2.80M  3.97M
data01       122G  20.3T    153     67  2.68M  4.65M
data01       122G  20.3T    164     66  2.63M  4.10M
data01       122G  20.3T    171     66  2.75M  4.51M
data01       122G  20.3T    175     53  3.02M  3.83M
data01       122G  20.3T    157     59  2.64M  3.80M
data01       122G  20.3T    172     59  2.85M  4.11M
data01       122G  20.3T    173     68  2.99M  4.11M
data01       122G  20.3T     97     35  1.66M  2.61M
data01       122G  20.3T    170     58  2.87M  3.62M
data01       122G  20.3T    160     64  2.72M  4.17M
data01       122G  20.3T    163     63  2.68M  3.77M
data01       122G  20.3T    160     60  2.67M  4.29M
data01       122G  20.3T    165     65  2.66M  4.05M
data01       122G  20.3T    191     59  3.25M  3.97M
data01       122G  20.3T    159     65  2.76M  4.18M
data01       122G  20.3T    154     52  2.64M  3.50M
data01       122G  20.3T    164     61  2.76M  4.38M
data01       122G  20.3T    154     62  2.66M  4.08M
data01       122G  20.3T    160     58  2.71M  3.95M
data01       122G  20.3T     84     34  1.48M  2.37M
data01       122G  20.3T      9  7.27K   156K   125M
data01       122G  20.3T     25  5.20K   422K  84.3M
data01       122G  20.3T    170     60  2.77M  3.64M
data01       122G  20.3T    170     63  2.85M  3.85M
 
So it appears NFS is doing syncs, while iSCSI is not (See my earlier zpool 
iostat data for iSCSI). Isn't this what we expect, because NFS does syncs, 
while iSCSI does not (assumed)?

-Scott
-- 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to