-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Magda a écrit : > On Wed, June 24, 2009 08:42, Philippe Schwarz wrote: > >> In my tests ESX4 seems to work fine with this, but i haven't already >> stressed it ;-) >> >> Therefore, i don't know if the 1Gb FDuplex per port will be enough, i >> don't know either i'have to put sort of redundant access form ESX to >> SAN,etc.... >> >> Is my configuration OK ? It's only a preprod install, i'm able to break >> almost everything if it's necessary. > > At least in 3.x, VMware had a limitation of only being able to use one > connection per iSCSI target (even if there were multiple LUNs on it): > > http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2009-June/028731.html > > Not sure if that's changed in 4.x, so if you're going to have more than > one LUN, then having more than one target may be advantageous. See also: > > http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/iSCSI_design_deploy.pdf > > You may want to go to the VMware lists / forums to see what the people > there say as well. >
> Out of curiosity, any reason why went with iSCSI and not NFS? There seems > to be some debate on which is better under which circumstances. iSCSI instead of NFS ? Because of the overwhelming difference in transfer rate between them,.... In fact, that's what i read. And setting isCSI target is so simple, that i didn't even search another solution. Thanks for your answer. - -- Cordialement. - - Lycée Alfred Nobel,Clichy sous bois http://www.lyceenobel.org KeyID 0x46EA1D16 FingerPrint 997B164F4F606A61E7B1FC61961A821646EA1D16 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkpCkpgACgkQlhqCFkbqHRZYtACfc5QMhQmWvC1wAZD36YLJkBNT XV8An0DPj+te+ppS0fBAlDL8vmFKMGG+ =h0Nv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
