What does 'zpool status -xv' show?
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Ben Miller <mil...@eecis.udel.edu> wrote: > I forgot the pool that's having problems was recreated recently so it's > already at zfs version 3. I just did a 'zfs upgrade -a' for another pool, > but some of those filesystems failed since they are busy and couldn't be > unmounted. > > # zfs upgrade -a > cannot unmount '/var/mysql': Device busy > cannot unmount '/var/postfix': Device busy > .... > 6 filesystems upgraded > 821 filesystems already at this version > > Ben > >> You can upgrade live. 'zfs upgrade' with no >> arguments shows you the >> zfs version status of filesystems present without >> upgrading. >> >> >> >> On Jan 24, 2009, at 10:19 AM, Ben Miller >> <mil...@eecis.udel.edu> wrote: >> >> > We haven't done 'zfs upgrade ...' any. I'll give >> that a try the >> > next time the system can be taken down. >> > >> > Ben >> > >> >> A little gotcha that I found in my 10u6 update >> >> process was that 'zpool >> >> upgrade [poolname]' is not the same as 'zfs >> upgrade >> >> [poolname]/[filesystem(s)]' >> >> >> >> What does 'zfs upgrade' say? I'm not saying this >> is >> >> the source of >> >> your problem, but it's a detail that seemed to >> affect >> >> stability for >> >> me. >> >> >> >> > -- > This message posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss > _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
