Bug ID is 6793967.
This problem just happened again.
% zpool status pool1
pool: pool1
state: DEGRADED
scrub: resilver completed after 0h48m with 0 errors on Mon Jan 5 12:30:52 2009
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
pool1 DEGRADED 0 0 0
raidz2 DEGRADED 0 0 0
c4t8d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t9d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t10d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t11d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t12d0s0 REMOVED 0 0 0
c4t13d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors
% zpool status -x
all pools are healthy
%
# zpool online pool1 c4t12d0s0
% zpool status -x
pool: pool1
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices is currently being resilvered. The pool will
continue to function, possibly in a degraded state.
action: Wait for the resilver to complete.
scrub: resilver in progress for 0h0m, 0.12% done, 2h38m to go
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
pool1 ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz2 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t8d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t9d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t10d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t11d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t12d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c4t13d0s0 ONLINE 0 0 0
errors: No known data errors
%
Ben
> I just put in a (low priority) bug report on this.
>
> Ben
>
> > This post from close to a year ago never received
> a
> > response. We just had this same thing happen to
> > another server that is running Solaris 10 U6. One
> of
> > the disks was marked as removed and the pool
> > degraded, but 'zpool status -x' says all pools are
> > healthy. After doing an 'zpool online' on the
> disk
> > it resilvered in fine. Any ideas why 'zpool
> status
> > -x' reports all healthy while 'zpool status' shows
> a
> > pool in degraded mode?
> >
> > thanks,
> > Ben
> >
> > > We run a cron job that does a 'zpool status -x'
> to
> > > check for any degraded pools. We just happened
> to
> > > find a pool degraded this morning by running
> > 'zpool
> > > status' by hand and were surprised that it was
> > > degraded as we didn't get a notice from the cron
> > > job.
> > >
> > > # uname -srvp
> > > SunOS 5.11 snv_78 i386
> > >
> > > # zpool status -x
> > > all pools are healthy
> > >
> > > # zpool status pool1
> > > pool: pool1
> > > tate: DEGRADED
> > > scrub: none requested
> > > onfig:
> > >
> > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
> > > pool1 DEGRADED 0 0 0
> > > raidz1 DEGRADED 0 0 0
> > > c1t8d0 REMOVED 0 0 0
> > > c1t9d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
> > > c1t10d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
> > > c1t11d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
> > > No known data errors
> > >
> > > I'm going to look into it now why the disk is
> > listed
> > > as removed.
> > >
> > > Does this look like a bug with 'zpool status
> -x'?
> > >
> > > Ben
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
