+1
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Paul Schlie <sch...@comcast.net> wrote: > It also wouldn't be a bad idea for ZFS to also verify drives designated as > hot spares in fact have sufficient capacity to be compatible replacements > for particular configurations, prior to actually being critically required > (as if drives otherwise appearing to have equivalent capacity may not, it > wouldn't be a nice thing to first discover upon attempted replacement of a > failed drive). > > > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss > _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
