On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 3:09 PM, milosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi all,
>
> currently having trouble with sustained write performance with my setup...
>
> ms server 2003/ms iscsi initiator 2.08 w/intel e1000g nic directly connected 
> to snv_101 w/ intel e1000g nic.
>
> basically, given enough time, the sustained write behavior is perfectly 
> periodic.  if i copy a large file to the iscsi target, iostat reports 10 
> seconds or so of -no- writes to disk, just small reads... then 2-3 seconds of 
> disk-maxed writes, during which time windows reports the write performance 
> dropping to zero (disk queues maxed).
>
> so iostat will report something like this for each of my zpool disks (with 
> iostat -xtc 1)
>
> 1s: %b 0
> 2s: %b 0
> 3s: %b 0
> 4s: %b 0
> 5s: %b 0
> 6s: %b 0
> 7s: %b 0
> 8s: %b 0
> 9s: %b 0
> 10s: %b 0
> 11s: %b 100
> 12s: %b 100
> 13s: %b 100
> 14s: %b 0
> 15s: %b 0
>
> it looks like solaris hangs out caching the writes and not actually 
> committing them to disk... when the cache gets flushed, the iscsitgt (or 
> whatever) just stops accepting writes.
>
> this is happening across controllers and zpools.  also, a test copy of a 10gb 
> file from one zpool to another (not iscsi) yielded similar iostat results: 10 
> seconds of big reads from the source zpool, 2-3 seconds of big writes to the 
> target zpool (target zpool is 5x  bigger than source zpool).
>
> anyone got any ideas?  point me in the right direction?
>
> thanks,
>
> milosz
> --
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> _______________________________________________
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
>

Are you running at compression? I see this behavior with heavy loads,
and GZIP compression enabled.
What does 'zfs get compression' say?

-- 
Brent Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to