Yeah? http://www.adaptec.com/en-US/products/Controllers/Hardware/sas/value/SAS-31605/_details/Series3_FAQs.htm Snapshot is a big deal?
Windows OS does that too. Compression -- where is the performance data showing compression in OpenSolaris has little overhead? Clones -- tell me the benefit of Clone when we have point-in-time copies with continuous, policy-based protection? And snapshot images are mostly writable and sync-able today? Man, I am an open storage analyst, please, tell me I am wrong!!!!! zStorageAnalyst ----- Original Message ----- From: "William D. Hathaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org> Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2008 11:41 PM Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Hardware Raid Vs ZFS implementation on Sun X4150/X4450 >I don't understand your statement/questions. This wasn't a response to >"ZFS versus every possible storage platform in the world". The original >poster was asking about comparing ZFS versus hardware RAID on specific >machines as mentioned in the title. AFAIK you don't get compression, >snapshots and clones with standard hardware RAID cards. > -- > This message posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
