I think my problem is actually different - I'm not using iSCSI at all. I will update if I find otherwise.
And yes, I do think there is support available for OpenSolaris now: <http://www.sun.com/service/opensolaris/faq.xml> Blake On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Jacob Ritorto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> Update: It would appear that the bug I was complaining about nearly a >> year ago is still at play here: >> http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=49372&tstart=0 >> >> Unfortunate Solution: Ditch Solaris 10 and run Nevada. The nice folks >> in the OpenSolaris project fixed the problem a long time ago. >> >> This means that I can't have Sun support until Nevada becomes a >> real product, but it's better than having a silent failure every time >> 6GB crosses the wire. My big question is why won't they fix it in >> Solaris 10? Sun's depriving themselves of my support revenue stream and >> I'm stuck with an unsupportable box as my core filer. Bad situation on >> so many levels.. If it weren't for the stellar quality of the Nevada >> builds (b91 uptime=132 days now with no problems), I'd not be sleeping >> much at night.. Imagine my embarrassment had I taken the high road and >> spent the $$$ for a Thumper for this purpose.. > > > Can't you just run opensolaris? They've got support contracts for that, and > the bug should be fixed in 2008.11. > > --Tim > > _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
