On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Jacob Ritorto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Update:  It would appear that the bug I was complaining about nearly a
> year ago is still at play here:
> http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=49372&tstart=0
>
> Unfortunate Solution:  Ditch Solaris 10 and run Nevada.  The nice folks
> in the OpenSolaris project fixed the problem a long time ago.
>
>        This means that I can't have Sun support until Nevada becomes a
> real product, but it's better than having a silent failure every time
> 6GB crosses the wire.  My big question is why won't they fix it in
> Solaris 10?  Sun's depriving themselves of my support revenue stream and
> I'm stuck with an unsupportable box as my core filer.  Bad situation on
> so many levels..  If it weren't for the stellar quality of the Nevada
> builds (b91 uptime=132 days now with no problems), I'd not be sleeping
> much at night..  Imagine my embarrassment had I taken the high road and
> spent the $$$ for a Thumper for this purpose..
>


Can't you just run opensolaris?  They've got support contracts for that, and
the bug should be fixed in 2008.11.

--Tim
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to