> In other words, for random access across a working set larger (by say X%) > than the SSD-backed L2 ARC, the cache is useless. This should asymptotically > approach truth as X grows and experience shows that X=200% is where it's > about 99% true. > Ummm, before we throw around phrases like useless, how about a little testing ? I like a good academic argument just like the next guy, but before I dismiss something completely out of hand I'd like to see some data.
Bob _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
