> For those interested, we are using the iorate command from EMC for > the benchmark. For the different test, we have 13 luns presented. > Each one is its own volume and filesystem and a singel file on those > filesystems. We are running 13 iorate processes in parallel (there > is no cpu bottleneck in this either). > > For zfs, we put all those luns in a pool with no redundancy and > created 13 filesystems and still running 13 iorate processes.
This doesn't seem like an apples-to-apples comparison, unless I'm misunderstanding. If you put all of those luns in a single pool for zfs, you should similarly put all of them in a single volume for vxvm. Todd _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
