Are you putting your archive and redo logs on a separate zpool (not  
just a different zfs fs with the same pool as your data files) ?

Are you using direct io at all in any of the config scenarios you  
listed?

/dale

On Nov 22, 2008, at 12:41 PM, Chris Greer wrote:

> So to give a little background on this, we have been benchmarking  
> Oracle RAC on Linux vs. Oracle on Solaris.  In the Solaris test, we  
> are using vxvm and vxfs.
> We noticed that the same Oracle TPC benchmark at roughly the same  
> transaction rate was causing twice as many disk I/O's to the backend  
> DMX4-1500.
>
> So we concluded this is pretty much either Oracle is very different  
> in RAC, or our filesystems may be the culprits.  This testing is  
> wrapping up (it all gets dismantled Monday), so we took the time to  
> run a simulated disk I/O test with an 8K IO size.
>
>
> vxvm with vxfs we achieved 2387 IOPS
> vxvm with ufs we achieved 4447 IOPS
> ufs on disk devices we achieved 4540 IOPS
> zfs we achieved 1232 IOPS
>
> The only zfs tunings we have done are setting set zfs:zfs_nocache=1
> in /etc/system and changing the recordsize to be 8K to match the test.
>
> I think the files we are using in the test were created before we  
> changed the recordsize, so I deleted them and recreated them and  
> have started the other test...but does anyone have any other ideas?
>
> This is my first experience with ZFS with a comercial RAID array and  
> so far it's not that great.
>
> For those interested, we are using the iorate command from EMC for  
> the benchmark.  For the different test, we have 13 luns presented.   
> Each one is its own volume and filesystem and a singel file on those  
> filesystems.  We are running 13 iorate processes in parallel (there  
> is no cpu bottleneck in this either).
>
> For zfs, we put all those luns in a pool with no redundancy and  
> created 13 filesystems and still running 13 iorate processes.
>
> we are running Solaris 10U6
> -- 
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> _______________________________________________
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to