On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Miles Nordin wrote: > > I thought NFSv2 -> NFSv3 was supposed to make this prestoserv, SSD, > battery-backed DRAM stuff not needed for good performance any more. I > guess not though.
The intent was to allow the server to be able to buffer up more uncommitted data before the client system requested that it be committed to store. In this case, if the server spontaneously rebooted, the client is responsible for remembering the uncomitted data that it already sent so that it can send it again. This means that client behavior has quite a lot to do with perceived NFSv3 performance. Bob ====================================== Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
