Just to clarify a few items... consider a setup where we desire to use AVS to 
replicate the ZFS pool on a 4 drive server to like hardware.  The 4 drives are 
setup as RaidZ.

If we lose a drive (say #2) in the primary server, RaidZ will take over, and 
our data will still be "available" but the array is at a degraded state.

But what happens to the secondary server?  Specifically to its bit-for-bit copy 
of Drive #2... presumably it is still good, but ZFS will offline that disk on 
the primary server, replicate the metadata, and when/if I "promote" the 
seconday server, it will also be running in a degraded state (ie: 3 out of 4 
drives).  correct?

In this scenario, my replication hasn't really bought me any increased 
availablity... or am I missing something?  

Also, if I do chose to fail over to the secondary, can I just to a scrub the 
"broken" drive (which isn't really broken, but the zpool would be inconsistent 
at some level with the other "online" drives) and get back to "full speed" 
quickly? or will I always have to wait until one of the servers resilvers 
itself (from scratch?), and re-replicates itself??

thanks in advance.

-Matt
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to