On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the interest of "full disclosure" I have changed the sha256.c in the > ZFS source to use the default kernel one via the crypto framework rather > than a private copy. I wouldn't expect that to have too big an impact (I > will be verifying it I just didn't have the data to hand quickly).
Would this also make it so that it would use hardware assisted sha256 on capable (e.g N2) platforms? Is that the same as this change from long ago? http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-code/2007-March/000448.html -- Mike Gerdts http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
