One can carve furniture with an axe, especially if it's razor-sharp, but that doesn't make it a spokeshave, plane and saw.
I love star office, and use it every day, but my publisher uses Frame, so that's what I use for books. --dave W. Wayne Liauh wrote: >>I doubt so. Star/OpenOffice are word processors... >>and like Word they are not suitable for typesetting >>documents. >> >>SGML, FrameMaker & TeX/LateX are the only ones >>capable of doing that. > > > This was pretty much true about a year ago. However, after version 2.3, > which adds the kerning feature, OpenOffice.org can produce very > professionally looking documents. > > All of the OOo User Guides, which are every bit as complex as if not more so > than our own user guides, are now "self-generated". Solveig Haugland, a > highly respected OpenOffice.org consultant, published her book > "OpenOffice.org 2 Guidebook" (a 527-page book complete with drawings, table > of contents, multi-column index, etc.) entirely on OOo. > > Another key consideration, in addition to perhaps a desire to support our > sister product, is that the documents so generated are guaranteed to be > displayable on the OS they are intended to serve. This is a pretty important > consideration IMO. :-) > > > This message posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss > -- David Collier-Brown | Always do right. This will gratify Sun Microsystems, Toronto | some people and astonish the rest [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Mark Twain (905) 943-1983, cell: (647) 833-9377, (800) 555-9786 x56583 bridge: (877) 385-4099 code: 506 9191# _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
