On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 03:43:29PM -0700, eric kustarz wrote: > > On Jun 6, 2008, at 3:27 PM, Brian Hechinger wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 02:58:09PM -0700, eric kustarz wrote: > >> > >>>> clients do not. Without per-filesystem mounts, 'df' on the client > >>>> will not report correct data though. > >>> > >>> I expect that mirror mounts will be coming Linux's way too. > >> > >> The should already have them: > >> http://blogs.sun.com/erickustarz/en_US/entry/linux_support_for_mirror_mounts > > > > Where does that leave those of us who need to deal with OSX > > clients? Does apple > > have any plans to get in on this? > > They need to implement NFSv4 in general first :)
Technically, Mac OS X 10.5 "Leopard" has some basic NFSv4.0 support in it. But just enough to make it look like it passes all the Connectathon tests. Not enough to warrant use by anyone but the terminally curious (or masochistic). This is mentioned briefly in the mount_nfs(8) man page. It would be reasonable to expect that future MacOSX releases will include increasing levels of functionality and that NFSv4 will eventually be made the default NFS version. > But you'd have to > ask them on their lists what the status of that is... i know i would > like it... Or get lucky and happen to have one of their engineers catch the question on this list and reply... ;-) --macko _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
