One other thing I noticed is that OpenSolaris (.com) will automatically install ZFS root for you. Will Nexenta do that?
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:31 PM, Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Depends on what your end goal is really. The opensolaris.com version is > releasing every 6 months, and I don't believe there's currently any patching > between releases. If you feel comfortable sitting on it that long, with > potential bugs for 6 months, great. If not... it should be an easy choice. > Personally I chose option 3 and loaded nexenta. You get regular updates, > but it still *stable* (or has been for me to date). > > --Tim > > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Christopher Gibbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> Pretty much what the subject says. I'm wondering which platform will >> have the best stability/performance for a ZFS file server. >> >> I've been using Solaris Express builds of Nevada for quite a while and >> I'm currently on build 79b but I'm at a point where I want to upgrade. >> So now I have to ask, should I go with the OpenSolaris (.com) release >> instead? Also, is there one that has better/newer driver support? >> (Mostly in relation to SATA controllers) >> >> Not sure if this is the right place to post this but since my main >> goal is a ZFS server then I should get your guys opinions. >> >> -- >> Christopher Gibbs >> Programmer / Analyst >> Web Integration & Programming >> Abilene Christian University >> _______________________________________________ >> zfs-discuss mailing list >> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss > > -- Christopher Gibbs Programmer / Analyst Web Integration & Programming Abilene Christian University _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
