Depends on what your end goal is really. The opensolaris.com version is releasing every 6 months, and I don't believe there's currently any patching between releases. If you feel comfortable sitting on it that long, with potential bugs for 6 months, great. If not... it should be an easy choice. Personally I chose option 3 and loaded nexenta. You get regular updates, but it still *stable* (or has been for me to date).
--Tim On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Christopher Gibbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pretty much what the subject says. I'm wondering which platform will > have the best stability/performance for a ZFS file server. > > I've been using Solaris Express builds of Nevada for quite a while and > I'm currently on build 79b but I'm at a point where I want to upgrade. > So now I have to ask, should I go with the OpenSolaris (.com) release > instead? Also, is there one that has better/newer driver support? > (Mostly in relation to SATA controllers) > > Not sure if this is the right place to post this but since my main > goal is a ZFS server then I should get your guys opinions. > > -- > Christopher Gibbs > Programmer / Analyst > Web Integration & Programming > Abilene Christian University > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss >
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
