Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While Linus may be the de-facto Linux spokesperson, he does not hold > the many thousands of copyrights to Linux so he does not "own" the > work. It is a hopeless case. The FSF was a bit wiser since they made > sure that everyone who contributed to their projects signed over the > copyrights to them (a tedious process to be sure).
Linus together with a "few" other people could change the license for Linux. He only needs to make sure that these people cover more than 50% of the code and that no single contributor who owns more than 5% of the whole source remains unasked. It seems that less than 50 people need to agree on the license change. Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss