Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> While Linus may be the de-facto Linux spokesperson, he does not hold 
> the many thousands of copyrights to Linux so he does not "own" the 
> work.  It is a hopeless case.  The FSF was a bit wiser since they made 
> sure that everyone who contributed to their projects signed over the 
> copyrights to them (a tedious process to be sure).

Linus together with a "few" other people could change the license for Linux.

He only needs to make sure that these people cover more than 50% of the code 
and that no single contributor who owns more than 5% of the whole source 
remains unasked.

It seems that less than 50 people need to agree on the license change.

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       [EMAIL PROTECTED]                (uni)  
       [EMAIL PROTECTED]     (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to