> I'm just interested in understanding how zfs determined there was data > corruption when I have checksums disabled and there were no > non-retryable read errors reported in the messages file.
If the metadata is corrupt, how is ZFS going to find the data blocks on disk? > > I don't believe it was a real disk read error because of the > > absence of evidence in /var/adm/messages. It's not safe to jump to this conclusion. Disk drivers that support FMA won't log error messages to /var/adm/messages. As more support for I/O FMA shows up, you won't see random spew in the messages file any more. -j _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
