Orvar Korvar wrote: > Ok, thanx for your answers! > > So, I guess there is no point in providing a database on top of ZFS, just as > MS tried to do? A WinFS like thing on ZFS wouldnt be beneficial at all? > Better off with plain ZFS? >
I don't think this is a simple question. The way ZFS is designed, you could plug a new module into the DMU. Most people interface with the ZPL (POSIX Layer) module, with some folks using ZVols. There is nothing to say that you can't come up with another module that leverages the DMU. -- richard _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
