On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Orvar Korvar wrote: > > So, I guess there is no point in providing a database on top of ZFS, > just as MS tried to do? A WinFS like thing on ZFS wouldnt be > beneficial at all? Better off with plain ZFS?
That would depend entirely on requirements and expectations. The issues are not really related to the filesystem so a properly implemented solution which works on NTFS should also work on zfs or any other standards-compliant filesystem. It would be pretty foolish for Microsoft to implement something which only works for the local system and not for networked clients, so it would need to be able to work over SMB. Likewise, it should be possible to store the data on a server somewhere. Bob ====================================== Bob Friesenhahn [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
