[i]Consider this to be your life's mission.[/i]

Bob, I can do without this.

Richard,

[i]Actually I use several browsers every day. Each
browser has a cache located somewhere in my home
directory and the cache is managed so that it won't
grow very large. With CDP, I would fill my disk in
a week or less, just by caching everything on the
internet that I pass by.[/i]

if you RTFT, you'd find that nobody ever was interested in temp files.

[i]In Uwe's use cases thus far, it seems that he is interested in only the
simple single user style applications, if I'm not mistaken, so he's not
considering the consequences of what it *really* means to have CDP in
the way he wishes.

Uwe - am I close here?[/i]

Nathan, you are not.


Again, there's nothing that I "wanted". I was only thinking. And I am a server 
person. Now, if I switch from the /export/home/userfoo/Documents (for Richard, 
who might be happier with UZFS-CDP than with the shots of TimeMachine), to a 
file server, do the arguments still hold, that
1. The application (NFS - sftp) does not know about the state of writing?
2. Obviously nobody sees anything in having access to all versions of a file 
stored there?

In any case, my presentation at that enterprise-security related conference is 
done, the 'history' of backups presented (not exactly my topic). I introduced 
the idea of versioning, and the (possible) advantages of having all versions, 
including the (possible) disadvantages (storage space, mentioned despite my 
doubts). I also pointed out the currently available software for near-CDP, and 
mentioned the discussion we have in here; started for one and only reason (see 
Subject): to confirm if ZFS can be instructed to produce a copy of each version 
of a file, initiated by some event instead of a scheduler.

Somewhat to my surprise, my presentation was a good success, and Q&A was 
focused on the event-driven backups, what the technical problems were, etc. A 
good handful of people approached me later, being curious and fascinated by the 
idea to replace the backup scheduler with an event-driven creation of the 
versions.

Therefore, to me the case is closed; my presentation done, on the successful 
side.

Thanks to everyone who cared to answer, help, contribute in one way or another,

Uwe
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to