[i]Even then, I'm still confused as to how I
would do anything much useful with this over and above, say, 1 minute
snapshots.[/i]

Hi Nathan,

I was hoping to be clear with my examples. 
Within that 1 minute the user has easily received the mail alert that 5 mails 
have arrived, has seen the sender and deleted them. Without any trigger of some 
snapshot, or storage of that state while the messages were actually on the 
drive. No recovery possible. One minute is much too long. Taking the average 
reaction time of users, we cannot expect, on the other hand, that the user is 
able to perform more than two operations within less than a second (receiving 
the notice, recognising the sender, clicking 'Delete').

On the other hand, one minute is much too frequently w.r.t. efficient usage of 
resources. The normal situation on a workstation within 1 minute difference in 
time is, that the file(s) on which the user works, are unmodified. It might 
please the vendors of hardware and storage space to try a snapshot once per 
minute, but normally, the actual change content will be zero.

Logical consequence: If one minute is much too long w.r.t. recovery and at the 
same time too short for scheduled snapshots, the whole thing is based on wrong 
premises. In this case, the wrong assumption that scheduled snapshots could 
serve the intended purpose of a versioning system comprising all relevant 
versions.

As much as ZFS is revolutionary, it is far away from being the 'ultimate file 
system', if it doesn't know how to handle event-driven snapshots (I don't like 
the word), backups, versioning. As long as a high-level system utility needs to 
be invoked by a scheduler for these features (CDP), and - this is relevant - 
*ZFS does not support these functionalities essentially different from FAT or 
UFS*, the days of ZFS are counted. Sooner or later, and I bet it is sooner, 
someone will design a file system (hardware, software, Cairo) to which the 
tasks of retiring files, as well as creating versions of modified files, can be 
passed down, together with the file handlles.
No need to believe me. But remember, you read it here first.

Uwe
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to