> If you ever progress beyond counting on your fingers
> you might (with a lot of coaching from someone who
> actually cares about your intellectual development)
> be able to follow Anton's recent explanation of this
> (given that the higher-level overviews which I've
> provided apparently flew completely over your head).

Seriously, are you 14?  NOTHING anton listed takes the place of ZFS, and your 
pie in the sky theories do not a product make.  So yet again, your long winded 
insult ridden response can be translated to "My name is billtodd, I haven't a 
fucking clue, I'm wrong, so I'll defer to my usual defensive tactics of 
attempting to insult those who know more, and have more experience in the REAL 
WORLD than I".  

You do a GREAT job of spewing theory, you do a piss poor job of relating 
ANYTHING to the real world.

> I discussed that in detail elsewhere here yesterday
> (in more detail than previously in an effort to help
> the slower members of the class keep up).

No, no you didn't.  You listed of a couple of bullshit products that don't come 
anywhere near the features of ZFS.  Let's throw out a bunch of half-completed 
projects that require hours of research just to setup, much less integrate, and 
call it done.

MDADM, next up you'll tell us we really never needed to move beyond fat, 
because hey, that really was *good enough* too!

But of course, your usual "well I haven't really used the product, but I have 
read up on it" excuse must be a get-out-of jail free card, AMIRITE?!
> 
>  and ease of
>  use
> 
> That actually may be a legitimate (though hardly
> decisive) ZFS advantage:  it's too bad its developers
> didn't extend it farther (e.g., by eliminating the
> vestiges of LVM redundancy management and supporting
> seamless expansion to multi-node server systems).
> 
> - bill

Right, they definitely shouldn't have released zfs because every feature they 
ever plan on implementing wasn't there yet.  

Tell you what, why don't you try using some of these products you've "read 
about", then you can come back and attempt to continue this discussion.  I 
don't care what your *THEORIES* are, I care about how things work here in the 
real world.

Better yet, you get back to writing that file system that's going to fix all 
these horrible deficiencies in zfs.  Then you can show the world just how 
superior you are. *RIGHT*
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to