Al Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've personally (and professionally) been bitten by all 3 above
> scenarios - more than once! IMHO, SATA point-to-point serial links
> are far more reliable than anything I could build with SCSI
> technology.
SCSI is (since SCSI-3) a layered protocol and the transport may be one of
various possibilities including:
50 wire cable
68 wire cable
80 wire cable
ATA Packet (ATAPI)
S-ATA Packet
SAS
FCAL
USB
1394
SCSI technology mainly is a protocol. In former times, it was built on top
of the 50 wire Shugart BUS (SASI). But this is more than 20 years ago.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
