> OK, I'll bite; it's not like I'm getting an answer to
> my other question.

Did I miss one somewhere?

> 
> Bill, please explain why deciding what to do about
> sequential scan 
> performance in ZFS is urgent?

It's not so much that it's 'urgent' (anyone affected by it simply won't use 
ZFS) as that it's a no-brainer.

> 
> ie why it's urgent rather than important (I agree
>  that if it's bad 
> hen it's going to be important eventually).

It's bad, and it's important now for anyone who cares whether ZFS is viable for 
such workloads.

> 
> ie why it's too urgent to work out, first, how to
> measure whether 
> we're succeeding.

You don't have to measure the *rate* at which the depth of the water in the 
boat is rising in order to know that you've got a problem that needs 
addressing.  You don't have to measure *just how bad* sequential performance in 
a badly-fragmented file is to know that you've got a problem that needs 
addressing (see both Anton's and Roch's comments if you don't find mine 
convincing).

*After* you've tried to fix things, *then* it makes sense to measure just how 
close you got to ideal streaming-sequential disk bandwidth in order to see 
whether you need to work some more.  Right now, the only reason to measure 
precisely how awful sequential scanning performance can get after severely 
fragmenting a file by updating it randomly in small chunks is to be able to 
hand out "Attaboy!"s for how much changing it improved things - even though 
this by itself *still* won't say anything about whether the result attained 
offered reasonable performance in comparison with what's attainable (which is 
what should *really* be the basis for handing out any "Attaboy!"s).

Rather than make a politically-incorrect comment about the Special Olympics 
here, I'll just ask whether common sense is no longer considered an essential 
attribute in an engineer:  given the nature of the discussions about this and 
about RAID-Z, I've really got to wonder.

- bill
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to