OK, I'll bite; it's not like I'm getting an answer to my other question. Bill, please explain why deciding what to do about sequential scan performance in ZFS is urgent?
ie why it's urgent rather than important (I agree that if it's bad then it's going to be important eventually). ie why it's too urgent to work out, first, how to measure whether we're succeeding. Regards, James. can you guess? wrote: <snip> > > Ah - Tests & Measurements types: you've just gotta love 'em. > > Wife: "Darling, is there really supposed to be that much water in the bottom > of our boat?" > <snip> > > Wife: "I'm really not a very good swimmer, dear: let's just head for shore." > > T&M: "That would be silly if there turns out not to be any problem, wouldn't > it?" > > (Wife hits T&M over head with bucket, grabs oars, and starts rowing.) > > - bill > _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
