On 11-Nov-07, at 10:19 AM, can you guess? wrote:

>>
>> On 9-Nov-07, at 2:45 AM, can you guess? wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>> This suggests that in a ZFS-style installation
>> without a hardware
>>> RAID controller they would have experienced at
>> worst a bit error
>>> about every 10^14 bits or 12 TB
>>
>>
>> And how about FAULTS?
>> hw/firmware/cable/controller/ram/...
>
> If you had read either the CERN study or what I already said about  
> it, you would have realized that it included the effects of such  
> faults.


...and ZFS is the only prophylactic available.


>
> ...
>
>>>  but I had a box that was randomly
>>>> corrupting blocks during
>>>> DMA.  The errors showed up when doing a ZFS scrub
>> and
>>>> I caught the
>>>> problem in time.
>>>
>>> Yup - that's exactly the kind of error that ZFS and
>> WAFL do a
>>> perhaps uniquely good job of catching.
>>
>> WAFL can't catch all: It's distantly isolated from
>> the CPU end.
>
> WAFL will catch everything that ZFS catches, including the kind of  
> DMA error described above:  it contains validating information  
> outside the data blocks just as ZFS does.

Explain how it can do that, when it is isolated from the application  
by several layers including the network?

--Toby

>
> ...
>
>>> CERN was using relatively cheap disks
>>
>> Don't forget every other component in the chain.
>
> I didn't, and they didn't:  read the study.
>
> ...
>
>>> Your position is similar to that of an audiophile
>> enthused about a
>>> measurable but marginal increase in music quality
>> and trying to
>>> convince the hoi polloi that no other system will
>> do:  while other
>>> audiophiles may agree with you, most people just
>> won't consider it
>>> important - and in fact won't even be able to
>> distinguish it at all.
>>
>> Data integrity *is* important.
>
> You clearly need to spend a lot more time trying to understand what  
> you've read before responding to it.
>
> - bill
>
>
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> _______________________________________________
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to