Lori Alt wrote: > I'm not surprised that having /usr in a separate pool failed. > The design of zfs boot largely assumes that root, /usr, and > /var are all on the same pool, and it is unlikely that we would > do the work to support any other configuration any time soon.
This seems, uhm, undesirable. I could understand if the initial *implementation* chose to make these simplifying assumptions, but if the *architecture* or *design* of the feature requires this, then, IMO, this project needs a TCR to not be done that way. Certainly, many of us will be satisfied with all-in-one pool, just as we are today with all all-in-one filesystem, so this makes sense as a first step. But, there needs to be the presumption that the next steps towards multiple pool support are possible without having to re-architect or re-design the whole zfs boot system. -John _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
