> Perhaps it's the same cause, I don't know... > > But I'm certainly not convinced that I'd be happy with a 25K, for > example, panicing just because I tried to import a dud pool... > > I'm ok(ish) with the panic on a failed write to a non-redundant storage. > I expect it by now... >
I agree, forcing a panic seems to be pretty severe and may cause as much grief as it prevents. Why not just stop allowing I/O to the pool so the sys admin can gracefully shutdown the system? Applications would be disrupted but no more so than they would be disrupted during a panic. _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
