Dick Davies wrote: > On 04/10/2007, Nathan Kroenert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Client A >> - import pool make couple-o-changes >> >> Client B >> - import pool -f (heh) >> > > >> Oct 4 15:03:12 fozzie ^Mpanic[cpu0]/thread=ffffff0002b51c80: >> Oct 4 15:03:12 fozzie genunix: [ID 603766 kern.notice] assertion >> failed: dmu_read(os, smo->smo_object, offset, size, entry_map) == 0 (0x5 >> == 0x0) >> , file: ../../common/fs/zfs/space_map.c, line: 339 >> Oct 4 15:03:12 fozzie unix: [ID 100000 kern.notice] >> Oct 4 15:03:12 fozzie genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ffffff0002b51160 >> genunix:assfail3+b9 () >> Oct 4 15:03:12 fozzie genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ffffff0002b51200 >> zfs:space_map_load+2ef () >> Oct 4 15:03:12 fozzie genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ffffff0002b51240 >> zfs:metaslab_activate+66 () >> Oct 4 15:03:12 fozzie genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ffffff0002b51300 >> zfs:metaslab_group_alloc+24e () >> Oct 4 15:03:12 fozzie genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ffffff0002b513d0 >> zfs:metaslab_alloc_dva+192 () >> Oct 4 15:03:12 fozzie genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ffffff0002b51470 >> zfs:metaslab_alloc+82 () >> Oct 4 15:03:12 fozzie genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ffffff0002b514c0 >> zfs:zio_dva_allocate+68 () >> Oct 4 15:03:12 fozzie genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ffffff0002b514e0 >> zfs:zio_next_stage+b3 () >> Oct 4 15:03:12 fozzie genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ffffff0002b51510 >> zfs:zio_checksum_generate+6e () >> Oct 4 15:03:12 fozzie genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ffffff0002b51530 >> zfs:zio_next_stage+b3 () >> Oct 4 15:03:12 fozzie genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ffffff0002b515a0 >> zfs:zio_write_compress+239 () >> Oct 4 15:03:12 fozzie genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ffffff0002b515c0 >> zfs:zio_next_stage+b3 () >> Oct 4 15:03:12 fozzie genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ffffff0002b51610 >> zfs:zio_wait_for_children+5d () >> Oct 4 15:03:12 fozzie genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ffffff0002b51630 >> zfs:zio_wait_children_ready+20 () >> Oct 4 15:03:12 fozzie genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ffffff0002b51650 >> zfs:zio_next_stage_async+bb () >> Oct 4 15:03:12 fozzie genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ffffff0002b51670 >> zfs:zio_nowait+11 () >> Oct 4 15:03:12 fozzie genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ffffff0002b51960 >> zfs:dbuf_sync_leaf+1ac () >> Oct 4 15:03:12 fozzie genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ffffff0002b519a0 >> zfs:dbuf_sync_list+51 () >> Oct 4 15:03:12 fozzie genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ffffff0002b51a10 >> zfs:dnode_sync+23b () >> Oct 4 15:03:12 fozzie genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ffffff0002b51a50 >> zfs:dmu_objset_sync_dnodes+55 () >> Oct 4 15:03:12 fozzie genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ffffff0002b51ad0 >> zfs:dmu_objset_sync+13d () >> Oct 4 15:03:12 fozzie genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ffffff0002b51b40 >> zfs:dsl_pool_sync+199 () >> Oct 4 15:03:12 fozzie genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ffffff0002b51bd0 >> zfs:spa_sync+1c5 () >> Oct 4 15:03:12 fozzie genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ffffff0002b51c60 >> zfs:txg_sync_thread+19a () >> Oct 4 15:03:12 fozzie genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ffffff0002b51c70 >> unix:thread_start+8 () >> Oct 4 15:03:12 fozzie unix: [ID 100000 kern.notice] >> > > >> Is this a known issue, already fixed in a later build, or should I bug it? >> > > It shouldn't panic the machine, no. I'd raise a bug. > > >> After spending a little time playing with iscsi, I have to say it's >> almost inevitable that someone is going to do this by accident and panic >> a big box for what I see as no good reason. (though I'm happy to be >> educated... ;) >> > > You use ACLs and TPGT groups to ensure 2 hosts can't simultaneously > access the same LUN by accident. You'd have the same problem with > Fibre Channel SANs. > I ran into similar problems when replicating via AVS.
benr. _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
