On Sat, 22 Sep 2007, Peter Tribble wrote: > filesystem per user on the server, just to see how it would work. While > managing 20,00 filesystems with the automounter was trivial, the attempt > to manage 20,000 zfs filesystems wasn't entirely successful. In fact, > based on that experience I simply wouldn't go down the road of one user > per filesystem.
Really? Could you provide further detail about what problems you experienced? Our current filesystem based on DFS effectively utilizes a separate filesystem per user (although in DFS terminology they are called filesets), and we've never had a problem managing them. > directories). This has been fixed, I believe, but only very recently in > S10.] As long as the fix has been included in U4 we should be good... -- Paul B. Henson | (909) 979-6361 | http://www.csupomona.edu/~henson/ Operating Systems and Network Analyst | [EMAIL PROTECTED] California State Polytechnic University | Pomona CA 91768 _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
