On 7/17/07, Richard Elling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Performance-wise, these are pretty wimpy. You should be able to saturate > the array controller, even without enabling RAID-5 on it. Note that the > T3's implementation of RAID-0 isn't quite the same as other arrays, so it > may perform somewhat differently (better) than you expect from JBODs.
This is similiar something I intend to do when we finally move off our T3's -- we have 9 T3, 2 T3B. I'd create 2 LUNs, 5 Disk RAID0 + 4 Disk RAID0 on each of the T3 and stagger mirror the LUNs with ZFS. The final pool will be used to house user filesystems for a compute cluster. I haven't gotten any benchmarks on this config yet -- still waiting for my T3's to come along... Can you please share the difference with the T3 implementation of RAID0? -- Just me, Wire ... Blog: <prstat.blogspot.com> _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
