Toby Thain, et al,
I am guessing here, but to just be able to access
the FS data locally without the headaches of
verifying FS consistency, write caches, etc.
Mitchell Erblich
----------------
Toby Thain wrote:
>
> On 13-Jun-07, at 1:14 PM, Rick Mann wrote:
>
> >> From (http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml;?
> >> articleID=199903525)
> >
> > ... Croll explained, "ZFS is not the default file system for
> > Leopard. We are exploring it as a file system option for high-end
> > storage systems with really large storage. As a result, we have
> > included ZFS -- a read-only copy of ZFS -- in Leopard."
>
> I don't get it. What possible use is "read only" ZFS?
>
> So that people can see if their FC array can be mounted on Leopard
> beta? I must be missing the point here.
>
> --Toby
>
> _______________________________________________
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
