Hello -
I think L4 still needs to evolve. BTW, i believe microkernels is the
_right_ way and L4 is a first step in that direction.
Perhaps you could elaborate on this? I thought the microkernel debate ended
in the 1990s, in terms of being a compelling technology direction for kernel
development targetting general purpose computing. Sure, there may be a niche
market for microkernels (which depends, in part, on your definition of
what a
microkernel is), but in terms of broad applicability, I thought the jury
was in.
CMU's Mach was the last run at this that had any momentum.
Thank you.
/jim
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
