>On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 10:16:34PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> >Oh, I see, this is bug 6479267: st_size (struct stat) is unreliable in >> >ZFS. Any word on when the fix will be out? >> >> It's a bug in scandir (obviously) and it is filed as such. >> >> Does scandir fail on zfs because of this or does scandir needs to >> reallocate and does it use the size as first order estimate? > >The bug is actually wrong - scandir() does work. It only uses the >st_size as an estimate of directory size, but then scales the array as >necessary. Apart from an odd malloc(0) and the poor linear scaling >algorithm, the function work fine with ZFS.
Ah, so it's not really a bug. Is this common for all scandir()s? Casper _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
