Ed Ravin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why does ZFS report such small directory sizes? For example, take a maildir
> directory with ten entries:
>
> total 2385
> drwx------ 8 17121 vmail 10 Jun 8 23:50 .
> drwx--x--x 14 root root 14 May 12 2006 ..
> drwx------ 5 17121 vmail 5 May 25 18:16 .Trash
> drwx------ 5 17121 staff 6 Jun 9 00:01 .testing
> -rw------- 1 17121 staff 0 Jun 8 18:30 .uidvalidity
> drwx------ 2 17121 root 2 Jun 6 19:33 courierimapkeywords
> -rw-r--r-- 1 17121 root 219951 Jun 8 18:29 courierimapuiddb
> drwx------ 2 17121 vmail 6144 Jun 9 09:59 cur
> drwx------ 2 17121 vmail 3 Jun 9 12:09 new
> drwx------ 2 17121 vmail 2 Jun 9 12:09 tmp
>
> Note how ".", this directory, is only 10 bytes long.
It is 10 entries long.
The POSIX standard would even allow to return 0 for all directories.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
