On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 02:50:15PM -0500, Al Hopper wrote: > On Fri, 25 May 2007, Lori Alt wrote: > > >We've been kicking around the question of whether or > >not zfs root mounts should appear in /etc/vfstab (i.e., be > >legacy mount) or use the new zfs approach to mounts. > >Instead of writing up the issues again, here's a blog > >entry that I just posted on the subject: > > > >http://blogs.sun.com/lalt/date/20070525 > > > >Weigh in if you care. > > ZFS is a paradigm shift and Nevada has not been released. Therefore I > vote for implementing it the "ZFS way" - going forward. Place the burden > on the "other" developers to fix their "bugs".
I second Al's point. In fact, I couldn't have said it better myself. :) -brian -- "Perl can be fast and elegant as much as J2EE can be fast and elegant. In the hands of a skilled artisan, it can and does happen; it's just that most of the shit out there is built by people who'd be better suited to making sure that my burger is cooked thoroughly." -- Jonathan Patschke _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
