> 
> On Apr 18, 2007, at 6:44 AM, Yaniv Aknin wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'd like to plan a storage solution for a system
> currently in  
> > production.
> >
> > The system's storage is based on code which writes
> many files to  
> > the file system, with overall storage needs
> currently around 40TB  
> > and expected to reach hundreds of TBs. The average
> file size of the  
> > system is ~100K, which translates to ~500 million
> files today, and  
> > billions of files in the future. This storage is
> accessed over NFS  
> > by a rack of 40 Linux blades, and is mostly
> read-only (99% of the  
> > activity is reads). While I realize calling this
> sub-optimal system  
> > design is probably an understatement, the design of
> the system is  
> > beyond my control and isn't likely to change in the
> near future.
> >
> > The system's current storage is based on 4 VxFS
> filesystems,  
> > created on SVM meta-devices each ~10TB in size. A
> 2-node Sun  
> > Cluster serves the filesystems, 2 filesystems per
> node. Each of the  
> > filesystems undergoes growfs as more storage is
> made available.  
> > We're looking for an alternative solution, in an
> attempt to improve  
> > performance and ability to recover from disasters
> (fsck on 2^42  
> > files isn't practical, and I'm getting pretty
> worried due to this  
> > fact - even the smallest filesystem inconsistency
> will leave me  
> > lots of useless bits).
> >
> > Question is - does anyone here have experience with
> large ZFS  
> > filesystems with many small-files? Is it practical
> to base such a  
> > solution on a few (8) zpools, each with single
> large filesystem in it?
> 
> hey Yaniv,
> 
> Why not 1 pool?  That's what we usually recommend
> (you can have 8  
> filesystems on top of the 1 pool if you need to).
> 
> eric

My guess that Yaniv assumes that 8 pools with 62.5 million files each have 
significantly less chances to be corrupted/cause the data loss than 1 pool with 
500 million files in it.
Do you agree with this?

TIA,
-- leon
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to