On 17-Apr-07, at 10:56 AM, James C. McPherson wrote:
Toby Thain wrote:
It seems that there are other reasons for the Linux kernel folks
for not
liking ZFS.
I certainly don't understand why they ignore it.
How can one have a "Storage and File Systems Workshop" in 2007
without ZFS dominating the agenda??
http://lwn.net/Articles/226351/
That "long fscks" should be a hot topic, given the state of the
art, is just bizarre.
Reading through the topics in that article, I get a
real sense of NIH syndrome.
The presentation on the fsck problem in 2013 ... if
you're still using a filesystem in 2013 that requires
you to fsck then I reckon you deserve what you get!
That's 6 years away, surely even linux fs developers
can come up with something better in that time.
They already did, in Reiser 3 & 4, which makes it even stranger.
--Toby
cheers,
James C. McPherson
--
Solaris kernel software engineer
Sun Microsystems
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
